Recent Posts

Boost of https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2022/a-web-for-all/

The replies I've seen to this post are so frustrating. You can definitely use the latest Javascript features and APIs while still providing access to older browsers and devices. You don't have to provide special access, determine a list of supported versions, or build a specific version for those browsers/devices.

Use a proper HTML foundation and your site will work without Javascript in nearly any browser. That covers weird edge cases like the one described. Then use the module/nomodule technique so you can write the sleekest code with all the modern amenities and still provide an ES5 bundle to browsers that need it. Then your site will work in nearly all cases, no matter the device, browser, or bugs in your code.

webdev

Reply To https://jamesg.blog/2022/01/10/scaling-indieweb-search/

IndieWeb Search, a search engine that indexes sites owned by IndieWeb community members and other related sites, has saved over 421,000 web documents. I maintain IndieWeb Search as a passion project. I wanted a place to search content from IndieWeb sites so that I could find articles and guides that were applicable to the community. Using the search engine, I'm able to get direct answers to niche, community-relevant queries such as how to set up webmentions with a static site or understanding what IRC is.

Check out https://searchmysite.net/. It's another independent search engine, though focused on independent websites in general, not just IndieWeb sites. Parts of it are in python and the developer has been looking for other contributors. Maybe your two projects could collaborate or they've picked up some ideas that you could use.

Boost of https://blog.searchmysite.net/posts/searchmysite.net-retrospective-and-future-plans/

A retrospective of how things have gone until year end 2021, and based on that some thoughts on where it should go in 2022.

Man, this is really sad to hear. Luckily, Search My Site isn't going anywhere right now, but costs steadily rising while usage remains steadily low is disheartening. We really need independent infrastructure like this, but we have to find a way to support it without advertisement.

tech decentralization

Reply To https://adactio.com/journal/18743

2022 was once unimaginable to some web folks.

Wow. I wasn't even in web development yet and I've been using HTML5 my entire career. I can't imagine hoping the web would be subsumed by native apps or thinking it would become obsolete. That was the era of move fast and break things, though, so imagining something being stable for more than a decade must have been hard.

Boost of https://css-tricks.com/working-with-web-feeds-its-more-than-rss/

Between Google Chrome experimenting with “following” sites, along with a growing frustration of how social media platforms limit a creator’s reach to their

It's good to see more articles like this and I hope the RSS resurgence continues. As for non-technical people not knowing how to use them, what do you expect? Facebook, Twitter, et al have spent a decade designing and teaching users specific workflows that they control. That shouldn't stop us from trying to make the switch. Sites like About Feeds can help publishers and users, but publishers have to be willing to put the links on their page.

Reply To https://jamesg.blog/2022/01/04/simple-taxonomies/

I used to have a section on my site where I shared a list of coffees I consumed. I was excited about this section because:

Congrats on the simplification. I don't want to throw a wrench into that, but just so you're aware, there are experiments with making official post types for most of the types you were posting. The IndieWeb wiki has pages for food/drink, watch, and read posts. I like the approach of making new types a note and just marking up additional properties. Then it's easy for you to manage it just like a note and consuming code can also treat it like a note and ignore the properties it doesn't understand. But there's always that possibility that the new properties gain traction and consumers start using them.

Boost of https://www.fastcompany.com/90501691/science-confirms-it-web-sites-really-do-all-look-the-same

We studied 10,000 websites and found that their design has become more uniform over time. What does this mean for the future of creative expression on the internet?

I think this is sort of to be expected. Like it says in the article, as a medium matures, design patters are formulated. Divergence from those patterns to test and tweak them is always good, but having some general uniformity improves familiarity and ease of use. But I think that only applies to corporate websites; I hope we'll continue to see personal sites with funky design used as places for expression.

webdev

Boost of https://gomakethings.com/web-tech-is-better.-developer-norms-are-worse./

Last week, Devon Govett, the creator of Parcel.js, tweeted… I don’t understand the “things were better in the late 2000s” school of web development thinking going around lately. Maybe it’s nostalgia for when people first started? Or not wanting to learn new things? Either way, no! I assure you, things are SOOO much better now. 😄 I wanted to unpack this tweet a bit, because I have strong feelings about it.

webdev

Bookmark of https://arstechnica.com/?p=1816778

Unspooled C code could eventually lead to PC ports, new mods, and more.

This is really cool and serves as an interesting historical record. The code of games of that generation is usually pretty clever. And this could lead to ports of the game, which is hugely important for games preservation. Companies don't do enough to provide access to games past their lifetime, so preservation projects are a big deal. Shoutout to the ZRET team for this work!

development tech gaming
Back To Top